Íà ãëàâíóþ
Î æóðíàëå Ðåäàêöèÿ Ïîäïèñêà Àðõèâ Àâòîðàì Êîíòàêòíàÿ èíôîðìàöèÿ
Æóðíàë «Ìåíåäæìåíò è áèçíåñ-àäìèíèñòðèðîâàíèå»
¹3 / 2023

Êðèçèñ âîåííî-ïðîìûøëåííîãî êîìïëåêñà ÑØÀ — îïûò ïðåîäîëåíèÿ

Åðåìèí Â.Â.,

êàíäèäàò ýêîíîìè÷åñêèõ íàóê, âåäóùèé íàó÷íûé ñîòðóäíèê Èíñòèòóòà ýêîíîìè÷åñêîé ïîëèòèêè è ïðîáëåì ýêîíîìè÷åñêîé áåçîïàñíîñòè, Ôèíàíñîâûé óíèâåðñèòåò ïðè Ïðàâèòåëüñòâå Ðîññèéñêîé Ôåäåðàöèè, Ìîñêâà, Ðîññèÿ,

Ñèëüâåñòðîâ Ñ.Í.,

äîêòîð ýêîíîìè÷åñêèõ íàóê, ïðîôåññîð, äèðåêòîð Èíñòèòóòà ýêîíîìè÷åñêîé ïîëèòèêè è ïðîáëåì ýêîíîìè÷åñêîé áåçîïàñíîñòè, Ôèíàíñîâûé óíèâåðñèòåò ïðè Ïðàâèòåëüñòâå Ðîññèéñêîé Ôåäåðàöèè, Ìîñêâà, Ðîññèÿ

Àííîòàöèÿ. Ïðèìåíåíèå ýôôåêòèâíûõ ìåòîäîâ àíòèêðèçèñíîãî óïðàâëåíèÿ ÷ðåçâû÷àéíî âàæíî äëÿ ñîâðåìåííîé ðîññèéñêîé ýêîíîìèêè, íàóêè, âîåííî-ïðîìûøëåííîãî êîìïëåêñà, íàõîäÿùèõñÿ â ñëîæíûõ ñàíêöèîííûõ óñëîâèÿõ. Èñïîëüçîâàíèå çàðóáåæíîãî îïûòà, õîðîøî çàðåêîìåíäîâàâøåãî ñåáÿ íà ïðàêòèêå, ïîçâîëèò ïîëó÷èòü ðåçóëüòàò áûñòðåå, ÷åì èñêëþ÷èòåëüíî ñîáñòâåííûé ïîäõîä ìåòîäîì «ïðîá è îøèáîê». ×ðåçâû÷àéíî ïåðñïåêòèâíûì äëÿ ðàñïðîñòðàíåíèÿ íà øèðîêèå ñôåðû ðîññèéñêîé ðåàëüíîñòè ïðåäñòàâëÿåòñÿ ýôôåêòèâíûé îïûò àíòèêðèçèñíîãî óïðàâëåíèÿ âîåííî-ïðîìûøëåííûì êîìïëåêñîì ÑØÀ â óñëîâèÿõ ñæàòèÿ âíóòðåííåãî ñïðîñà â 1990-å. Îñìûñëåíèå ýòîãî óñïåõà, àíàëèç óñëîâèé, ïðåäøåñòâîâàâøèõ åìó, àäàïòàöèÿ ðåçóëüòàòîâ àíàëèçà ê ðîññèéñêèì ðåàëèÿì — âñå ýòî ïîçâîëèò Ðîññèè áîëåå ýôôåêòèâíî ïðîòèâîñòîÿòü ìåæäóíàðîäíûì ñàíêöèÿì.

Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà: àíòèêðèçèñíîå óïðàâëåíèå, ìîíîïîëèçàöèÿ, äèâåðñèôèêàöèÿ, íàó÷íûå ðàçðàáîòêè, òåõíè÷åñêèé ïðîãðåññ, ÂÏÊ ÑØÀ, õîëîäíàÿ âîéíà, ôèíàíñîâûé êðèçèñ.

The crisis of the US military-industrial complex — experience of overcoming

Eremin V.V.,

Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Leading Researcher, Institute of Economic Policy and Problems of Economic Security, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia,

Sil’vestrov S.N.,

Doctor of Science (Economics), Professor, Director of the Institute of Economic Policy and Problems of Economic Security, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Abstract. The use of effective methods of anti-crisis management is extremely important for the modern economy, science, military-industrial complex, which in most countries suffer from breaks in supply chains and the sanctions crisis. The use of foreign experience, which has proven itself in practice, will allow you to get results faster than using your own «trial and error» approach. The effective experience of anti-crisis management of the US military-industrial complex under the conditions of contraction of domestic demand in the 1990s seems to be extremely promising for spreading to broad areas of developed and developing economies. Understanding this success, analyzing the conditions that preceded it, adapting the results of the analysis to national realities — all this will allow the country applying this experience to more effectively withstand the crisis. The analysis presented in the article allows us to conclude that the US military-industrial complex crisis of the 1990s is associated with the reduction of excessive funding of the 80s to the usual level of the Cold War. It has been determined that even a return to such a «commonness» led to a number of financial problems in the American military-industrial complex. It led to a reduction in personnel and production capacity, the threat of loss of competencies and technologies. The article analyzes in detail the measures taken by the US government and the management of private companies, which made it possible to bring the US military-industrial complex out of this crisis. A diagram of the relationship between these measures is presented. The results of the analysis can be applied far beyond the sphere of the military-industrial complex — in the development of science, civil industry, and the innovative sector of the economy.

Keywords: anti-crisis management, monopolization, diversification, scientific developments, technical progress, US military-industrial complex, cold war, financial crisis.

DOI: 10.33983/2075-1826-2023-3-121-136

Áèáëèîãðàôè÷åñêèé ñïèñîê

  1. Circular No. A-76 // The White House. — URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/legacy_drupal_files/omb/circulars/A76/a076.pdf (date of access: 22.09.2023).
  2. H.R.1837 — Services Acquisition Reform Act of 2003 // Congress.gov. — URL: https://www.congress.gov/bill/108th-congress/house-bill/1837 (date of access: 22.09.2023).
  3. H.R.5504 — Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1993 // Congress.gov. — URL: https://www.congress.gov/bill/102nd-congress/house-bill/5504 (date of access: 22.09.2023).
  4. National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993 // Justice.gov. — URL: https://www.justice.gov/atr/page/file/1197736/download (date of access: 22.09.2023).
  5. Public Law No. 101-189, National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and 1991 // Govinfo.gov. — URL: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-103/pdf/STATUTE-103-Pg1352.pdf (date of access: 22.09.2023).
  6. S.1250 — Stevenson Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 // Congress.gov. — URL: https://www.congress.gov/bill/96th-congress/senate-bill/1250 (date of access: 22.09.2023).
  7. S.1841 — National Cooperative Research Act of 1984 // Congress.gov. — URL: https://www.congress.gov/bill/98th-congress/senate-bill/1841 (date of access: 22.09.2023).
  8. S.2182 — National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995. Sec. 818 // Congress.gov. — URL: https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/senate-bill/2182/text (date of access: 22.09.2023).
  9. Anderson J.R. Bankrupting America: The impact of President Reagan's military budget // International Journal of Health Services. — 1981. — Vol. 11. — ¹ 4. — Pp. 623–629.
  10. Ben-Gad M., Ben-Haim Y. Peled, D. Allocating security expenditures under Knightian uncertainty: An info-gap approach // Defence and Peace Economics. — 2020. — Vol. 31. — ¹ 7. — Pp. 830–850. DOI: 10.1080/10242694.2019.1625518.
  11. Billing D.C., Fordy G.R., Friedl K.E., Hasselstr?m H. The implications of emerging technology on military human performance research priorities // Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. — 2021. — Vol. 24. — Iss. 10. — Pp. 947–953. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.10.007.
  12. Carter J., Ondercin H.L., Palmer G. Guns, Butter, and Growth: The Consequences of Military Spending Reconsidered // Political Research Quarterly. — 2021. — Vol. 74. — ¹ 1. — Pp. 148–165. DOI: 10.1177/1065912919890417.
  13. Deutch J. Consolidation of the U.S. Defense Industrial Base // Acquisition Review Quarterly (Fall). — 2001. — Vol. 8. — Pp. 137–50.
  14. Dundervill R.E. Jr., Gerity P.E., Hyder A.K., Luessen L.H. Defense Conversion Strategies. — Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2013. — 626 p.
  15. Dundon L. Ten Years of U.S. Defense Spending Increases: What Lessons for the Road Ahead? // Revue internationale et strat?gique. — 2014. — Vol. 96. — Pp. 87–96.
  16. Elveren A.Y., ?zg?r G., Dertli G. Military spending and sustainable development // Review of Development Economics. — 2022. — Vol. 26. — Iss. 3. — Pp. 1466–1490. DOI: 1466-1490.
  17. Fukuyama F. The End of History? // The National Interest. — 1989. — Vol. 16. — Pp. 3–18.
  18. Gerlach Jeffrey R. Pentagon Myths and Global Realities: The 1993 Military Budget // Cato Policy Analysis. — 1992. — ¹ 171. — Pp. 1–12.
  19. Gholz E., Sapolsky H.M. Restructuring the U.S. Defense Industry // International Security. — 1999–2000. — Vol. 24. — ¹ 3. — Pp. 5–51.
  20. Henderson D.R. US Federal Budget Restraint in the 1990s: A Success Story. — Arlington: Mercatus Research, Mercatus Center at George Mason University, 2015. — 25 p.
  21. O’Hanlon M.E. Forecasting Change in Military Technology, 2020–2040. — Washington DC: Brookings Institution, 2019. — 30 p.
  22. Robertson P.E. The Real Military Balance: International Comparisons of Defense Spending // Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth. — 2022. — Vol. 68. — ¹ 3. — Pp. 797–818. DOI: 10.1111/roiw.12536.
  23. Schmitt B. From Cooperation to Integration: Defence and Aerospace Industries in Europe. In Chaillot Paper. — Paris: WEU-ISS, 2000. — 105 p.
  24. Starr H., Hoole F.W., Hart J.A., Freeman J.R. The Relationship between Defense Spending and Inflation // The Journal of Conflict Resolution. — 1984. — Vol. 28. — ¹ 1. — Pp. 103–122.
  25. Wallerstein I. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. — Durham: Duke University Press, 2004. — 128 p.
  26. Douglass E. Northrop to Lay Off 2,700 in Downsizing // Los Angeles Times. — 1998. — 25 aug. — URL: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1998-aug-25-mn-16428-story.html (date of access: 22.09.2023).
  27. Justice department goes to court to block Lockheed Martin's purchase of Northrop Grumman merger is single largest ever challenged // Department of Justice. — URL: https://www.justice.gov/archive/atr/public/press_releases/1998/212681.htm (date of access: 22.09.2023).
  28. Lottman J. Warfare vs. welfare: subsidies to weapons exporters // Foreign Policy in Focus. — 1997. — 01 may. — URL https://fpif.org/warfare_vs_welfare_subsidies_to_weapons_exporters/ (date of access: 10.01.2023).
  29. Lundquist J.T. Shrinking Fast and Smart in the Defense Industry // Harvard Business Review. — 1992. — November–December. — URL: https://hbr.org/1992/11/shrinking-fast-and-smart-in-the-defense-industry (date of access: 22.09.2023).
  30. Marcus R., Devroy A. Asking American to «Face Facts», Clinton Presents Plan to Raise Taxes, Cut Deficit // Washington Post. — 1993. — 18 feb. — URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/states/stories/sou021893.htm (date of access: 22.09.2023).
  31. Military Standards Conversion. A New Way of Doing Business. A memorandum by William J. Perry // SAE International. — URL: https://www.sae.org/standardsdev/military/milperry.htm (date of access: 10.01.2023).
  32. Raytheon Company Announces Sale of MMIC Operations Acquired from Texas Instruments // Wireless Design Online. — 1998. — 12.01. — URL: https://www.wirelessdesignonline.com/doc/raytheon-company-announces-sale-of-mmic-opera-0001 (date of access: 22.09.2023).
  33. Raytheon cuts 14,000 jobs // CNN money. —1998. — 07 oct. — URL: https://money.cnn.com/1998/10/07/companies/raytheon/ (date of access: 22.09.2023).
  34. Roser M., Ortiz-Ospina E., Ritchie H., Mathieu E. Military Spending // OurWorldInData.org. — 2021. — URL: https://ourworldindata.org/military-spending (date of access: 22.09.2023).
  35. The Technology Reinvestment Project: Integrating Military and Civilian Industries // Congressional Budget Office. — URL: https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/103rd-congress-1993-1994/reports/93doc158.pdf (date of access: 22.09.2023).
  36. US and international research and development: funds and technology linkages // Science and engineering indicators 2004. — URL: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED486201.pdf (date of access: 22.09.2023).
  37. U.S. Military Spending/Defense Budget 1960–2023 // Macrotrends. — URL: https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/USA/united-states/military-spending-defense-budget (date of access: 22.09.2023).
© 2008-2024 Àêöèîíåðíîå îáùåñòâî «Èçäàòåëüñêèé äîì «Ýêîíîìè÷åñêàÿ ãàçåòà» (Joint Stock Company "Economic Newspaper" Publishing House)
Æóðíàë «Êîíúþíêòóðà òîâàðíûõ ðûíêîâ», æóðíàë «ÐÈÑÊ: Ðåñóðñû, Èíôîðìàöèÿ, Ñíàáæåíèå, Êîíêóðåíöèÿ»